5 Distro Linux Power User 2013

Power user Linux distros: 5 reviewed and rated

Although there isn’t any known definition of a Linux power user, they are a celebrated breed of Linux users. All newbies must toil long and hard with their Linux installations before they can describe themselves as one.

At the very least, power users have a great degree of skill on all things Linux, whether it’s the kernel, Bash or package management systems – and they aren’t afraid to get their hands dirty in the name of configuring the system.

Almost all modern Linux distributions require little from users before presenting them with a working distro. By definition, no power user will want to run any of these distros. This is why, despite their popularity, Ubuntu, and Mint are not featured here.

In addition to a driven installation, which separates these distros from most others, what’s even better is the adaptability quotient of the distros in our roundup. You can easily coax any of these distros to churn out music at parties, or host complex websites.

The development methodology and underlying package management system are still relevant concerns, but if you’re driven by the desire to squeeze every ounce of power out of your Linux distro, you could be a power user.

How we tested…

All of the distros on our list have been around for several years, some since the 90s; and in all this time they’ve each earned a large amount of praise by offering unique perks or advantages over their peers, whether this is in software management or ease of installation.

All these distros are extremely stable and the test isn’t so much about performance as adaptability. We’re looking for things that make them ideal for experienced Linux users who are tired of newbie-oriented distros and want to do more with their Linux machines. This is possible when you have great control over every aspect of the distro.

Everything should be configurable and capable of being changed to your liking. The ideal distro for power users is one that encourages you to fiddle and tinker extensively with all the different aspects of a distro, and makes you work towards a perfect system.

Test 1: Installation

How easy is the first step?

Slackware install

Even though the distros are aimed at power users, a distro that makes you want to tear your hair out isn’t worth recommending, no matter how much credibility it gets later on. It’s not a question of how long it takes to install, but rather how complicated the process is.

Slackware is one of our favourite distros, and its installation isn’t complicated at all, unless you consider an ncurses-based installer complicated. The installer is certainly different, but by no means difficult to navigate. You may want to keep a copy of the Slackware book with you, maybe on a notebook or tablet.

When you run the setup, which is a process that takes you through several installation steps, including package selection, pay special attention to the prompting mode and the software series. You can either install everything by selecting Full on the prompting mode, or select individual packages by choosing the Menu option.

You then have to select which software series to install. If you choose individual packages, the installer will not tell you how much space it will need. Slackware gets a bad rep because it doesn’t offer a graphical install, but it still provides a very straightforward installation.

Fedora and Debian both provide graphical installation, that they’ve perfected over the years. The process is very simple, and several tasks – such as partitioning of disks – are automated, but it’s best if you at least review the partitioning scheme or do it yourself, especially if there are existing partitions on the disk that you would like to preserve.

Fedora and Debian don’t let you select the packages to install when installing from the live CD. Even though it doesn’t provide a usable system post-installation, Arch is one of the easiest distros to install, with the most difficult step being network card configuration. If you’re unable to configure your wireless card, you can run an Ethernet cable to your machine until the installation is done, and then try to configure the card later.

Once the base system is installed, you move on to meatier things, such as installing the X window system, video drivers, if needed, and the desktop environment. Even after that is done, you still have to install all the apps you may want to use, such as Firefox, VLC, LibreOffice and others.

Installing Gentoo is far more tedious in comparison with the other distros, even Arch. It makes you define USE flags and compile the kernel, so be prepared for the installation to maybe run to several days, depending on your configuration and needs. We’ve covered the installation for both of these in LXF in the past, but the process has changed somewhat since then, so keep the installation documentation at hand when you begin.


Slackware: 4/5
Fedora: 5/5
Debian: 5/5
Arch: 5/5
Gentoo: 4/5

Test 2: default packages

Not that a power user cares either way…

Fedora default packages

An operating system is only an organised collection of a user’s preferred applications. If this is true, then despite completing the installation process, it’d be unwise to label Gentoo or Arch as operating systems, because what you have is a bare bones system that you have to then populate with all the applications that you require. Not only that, you don’t even get a default desktop environment, and have to choose one to install.

There are no defaults when working with Gentoo or Arch. Their intention is to give the user complete control over what they wish to install on the machine. While the other three distros in this roundup also allow you to select which packages to install during installation, they still aim to provide you with a nearly complete system. That means that out of the box, these distros offer a text editor, web browser, PDF reader and more.

For these three distros, despite the wide array of default packages, you still need to install codecs and other plugins before you can play media files, or enjoy videos on YouTube, or even get the most out of your proprietary graphics card.

Slackware doesn’t offer any office suite by default, unlike Fedora and Debian – which ship with LibreOffice and OpenOffice respectively. Depending on your installation media, whether the Gnome/KDE live CDs or the DVD, you can also choose what desktop environment to install with Fedora.

With Slackware, you only get the choice of KDE and XFCE during installation. Gnome fans will have to install their favourite environment post-installation.


Slackware: 4/5
Fedora: 5/5
Debian: 5/5
Arch: 1/5
Gentoo: 1/5

Test 3: adaptability

How easy is it to configure these distros to your liking?

We have repeated several times in this roundup that one of the best things about these distros is that they are highly configurable. But what does that really mean? Aren’t all Linux distros configurable?

You can change the desktop background, the icons theme, define keyboard shortcuts, configure power management, and make many other changes to the appearance and behaviour of all Linux distros, so what’s the big deal?

While most other distros stop at providing all the functionality listed above, the distros on our list go further and offer users the chance to make not just cosmetic changes but configure just about everything that can be configured. This gives you the chance to tweak everything per your specific needs, the kernel included!

You don’t have to install the distro and then go about removing packages and settings you don’t want, which will never deliver as good a system as one built from scratch to your specifications.

Gentoo – 5/5


Gentoo is an extremely configurable distro, that you can optimise for just about any application. The Portage system is at the heart of everything that’s great about Gentoo. It provides control when installing packages, and the USE flags enable it to provide compile-time option support. This means you can define the features you want a package to support.

For instance, if you don’t run the KDE desktop when you install packages, Gentoo compiles them without support for KDE. This is why defining the USE flags is an integral part of installation.

As it doesn’t burden you with unwanted apps or libraries, Gentoo is very fast. It insists you inspect the kernel during installation and remove features you don’t need. No other distro lets you streamline the kernel before installation.

Fedora – 3/5


The test bed of tools and technologies that eventually end up in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Fedora is an ideal distro for those hoping to be on the bleeding-edge of development.

Still, one of the worst things about Fedora is its default graphical front-end to yum. You should try Yumex if you want a stable and feature-rich alternative. While Slackware, Gentoo and Arch don’t give you the option, Fedora offers excellent graphical tools for any number of administrative tasks, such as configuring the network, firewall, etc. It’s perfect for almost all kinds of users, and can easily be configured to be a game station, music streamer or even web or file server.

Best suited for developers and admins because of the tools it has to offer, Fedora is not nearly as flexible as Gentoo, Arch or Slackware.

Slackware – 4/5


Whereas most distros make several changes to software packages, with Slackware you get packages nearly identical to upstream offerings. People complain of a steep learning curve, but anyone familiar with the command line and classic Unix tools will find it straightforward.

Striving to produce the most Unix-like distro available, Slackware makes ease of use and stability top priorities. This makes it ideal for servers. Slackware can be configured to run with KDE, XFCE or any desktop environment supporting any window manager. It gives great control over shaping the system during installation, thanks to its advanced package selection.

Slackware doesn’t follow an open development methodology, which means it doesn’t maintain a software repository or a bug tracking facility.

Debian – 4/5


Along with Slackware, Debian is like the Duracell bunny – it just keeps on going. Of course, that would mean that Gentoo and Arch are the metaphorical equivalent of a Duracell bunny on steroids.

Debian is extremely stable, and this makes it ideal for servers. Its ability to please a large section of general-purpose desktop users has often been questioned because of its insistence on shipping older packages to be as stable as it can be.

That said, you can easily use the unstable repository if you want to be on the bleeding-edge. In fact, each of the three official Debian repositories have inspired several other distros. With Debian, you can run the same distro across many different architectures, as it supports i386, SPARC, AMD64, PowerPC, MIPS, ARM and other platforms.

Almost all software packages provide binaries for Debian, so you won’t have installation woes for any package.

Arch – 5/5


Arch also doesn’t believe in hiding the internal workings of the system. Both these distros are great if you wish to learn what makes a Linux distro tick. But despite their similarities, Arch provides a somewhat simpler way of building your system. You don’t have to spend precious hours maintaining and grooming the system, as you do with Gentoo.

With its minimalistic philosophy, Arch stands in contrast to most other distros that compete to be the most feature-rich and beautiful. Other than a core system, which enables you to install additional packages, Arch makes no assumption about the kind of system you want, and allows users to mould the distro.

Building of the distro from the ground-up results in a much speedier system. Like Slackware, Arch provides software packages from upstream without any modifications.

On the next page: release schedules, documentation, package management and fun factor.

Test 4: release schedule

Not that a power user cares either way, part two

There are three popular development methodologies that Linux distributions typically adhere to – fixed schedule, fixed feature and rolling release. There’s the fixed schedule, as followed by Fedora, where they try to push a new release out every six months.

These distros, more often than not, are drastically different from one release to the next. Switching from one release to the next thus involves a fresh install, or at least major upgrade. This is more time-consuming and painstaking than a rolling release.

After years of unpredictable releases, Debian recently switched to a two-year release cycle. Next, we have the feature release model, as followed by Slackware. Here, instead of announcing a date for the next release, the distro is released when it’s good and ready. The project decides on a number of features it wishes to implement in the next release and works towards incorporating all the new features into the distro, releasing it only when all the features are added.

Lastly, you have the rolling release cycle. This practice is followed by Arch and Gentoo. These distros, instead of a full-sized release, offer a small, minimal distro that you can use to install the base system. You then install everything else that you need over the internet. With the very involved installation procedures that these distros require, the rolling release offers an install-and-forget way of working, and this is a feature that you can’t possibly dislike.


Slackware: 4/5
Fedora: 3/5
Debian: 3/5
Arch: 5/5
Gentoo: 5/5

Test 5: documentation

Because even a power user may need to RTFM

From installation, to desktop environment, to package management, Linux distros can sometimes change the status quo without warning. When this happens, the project’s documentation and a helpful community can make the difference between a fatal kernel panic and a smooth-running system.

All the distros in the roundup can boast of a large repository of helpful documentation. Some, like Debian and Fedora, have been the subject of detailed books that describe setting them up for home use or as servers. Additionally, the popularity of each of these distros means that you can easily find answers to your queries with a simple search on the internet.

Gentoo and Arch offer the most extensive documentation, detailing even the most basic of technologies, such as configuring the Ethernet interface or the Xinitrc and fstab files. This is especially needed for such distros because of their different way of doing things. Familiarity with any Linux distro can prepare you for just about all others, but Gentoo and Arch are so different that without proper documentation, even a seasoned Linux user might lose his footing.

All the distros also have an active community that you can engage with on mailing lists, forum boards and IRC. Additionally, Slackware and Debian provide on their websites a list of companies/individual consultants that can be tapped for technical support.


Slackware: 4/5
Fedora: 4/5
Debian: 4/5
Arch: 5/5
Gentoo: 5/5

Test 6: package management

Tools, repositories and happy customers


On Arch, you can use the Pacman package manager to install applications. Pacman uses compressed files, or tarballs, as a package format. It works by syncing the local packages with the server. Pacman supports dependency resolution and can download and install packages with a single command. The /etc/pacman.conf file contains a list of repositories.

In addition to the default, there’s also Arch User Repository (AUR), a community-driven repository maintained by Arch users. Arch users can vote on the packages in the AUR, and if a package gets enough votes and has a compatible licence, it gets pushed onto the official repositories.

Like Arch, Gentoo doesn’t provide any default packages, but it makes installing apps a breeze thanks to the Portage system, which is frequently identified as one of the best package management systems on Linux.

emerge is a command-line interface to the Portage system and, as with Pacman, you can use emerge to install, remove, upgrade and query packages. You may have to adjust the USE flags or use package.mask before you can install packages. This is a tedious process, especially for the uninitiated. The reliance on USE flags to define what packages you want or don’t want on your machine gives Gentoo an edge over the others. The package management systems on other distros also seem slower than Portage.

Home of the yum package manager, Fedora offers several graphical frontends for you to manage packages. yum relies on rpm packages, and you thus get the advantage of many different third-party repositories, in addition to the default. You will have to configure these repos if you wish to install multimedia codecs and plugins, as a stock Fedora installation doesn’t play many media file formats.

Debian’s package management systems, APT and dpkg, need no introduction. Both of these are like Clint Eastwood: they continue to deliver outstanding performances year after year. Debian allows you to configure several other repositories, such as non-free and contrib, which contains packages that don’t gel with the very strict Debian Free Software Guidelines. As with pacman and yum, you can use APT to install local packages, leveraging on the repositories to resolve dependencies.

Unlike the other distros, Slackware doesn’t offer a single full-featured tool for package management. Instead, you have a tool each to install, update and remove packages. As Slackware uses source tarballs as packages, you also get a tool to convert rpm packages to tar.gz packages.

If you’re willing to sacrifice a few features, you can use the pkgtool utility to manage packages. This tool allows you to install and remove packages, but nothing else.


Slackware: 2/5
Fedora: 4/5
Debian: 4/5
Arch: 5/5
Gentoo: 5/5

Test 7: fun quotient

Let’s put a smile on that face

Arch fun

Our whole reason for the selection of these distros is that they offer a chance for Linux users to go over and beyond what they are normally used to doing on their Linux systems. There’s a lot of mucking about with files such as /etc/fstab, and setting up hostname and configuring network interface with Arch and Gentoo. And all of it using command-line tools!

These are generally processes that almost all Linux distros outgrew by the time we entered the 21st century. Their insistence on doing some things the old-fashioned way is not what makes them special, but the fact that it gives you the chance to learn the many things that modern distros take for granted.

Fedora has a lot to offer if you’re interested in being at the cutting-edge of Linux development. If you’ve never ventured beyond newbie-friendly distros, such as Ubuntu and Mint, Fedora provides the perfect starting point towards attaining power user status.

Slackware and Debian are for more seasoned Linux users, who are willing to move towards more difficult things but still want enough familiarity to continue their learning. These distros introduce you to the possibility of working with the command line, as opposed to the graphical interface, for any number of routine tasks.

Finally, we have Arch and Gentoo. These are for those adventurous souls who are ready to learn a completely different way of working. These distros will introduce you to the core of Linux like no other distro. Forget graphical interfaces that obfuscate all configuration files. With these two distros, you are forced to spend time with configuration files you probably didn’t even know existed.


Slackware: 4/5
Fedora: 3/5
Debian: 3/5
Arch: 5/5
Gentoo: 5/5

The best Linux distro for power users is…

Gentoo Kernel

The only area where Gentoo and Arch falter is default packages, and we spent a lot of time debating whether we should award them five stars each. This is because by not providing any default packages they offer much greater control to the users to design the distro to their liking. This degree of control is the hallmark of a distro suited for power users.

After much consideration, we decided to dock points from both distros. Once that was done, it was obvious that we would have to be equally harsh on the scoring for the other distros in the documentation and package management sections.

This is why Debian and Fedora only managed four stars each in these two sections, despite offering detailed documentation and excellent package management tools. Even though we couldn’t find any fault in APT or yum, Arch’s Pacman and Gentoo’s Portage system fare better because of the level of sophistication and elegance with which they manage packages.

Debian and Slackware are an ideal starting point for would-be power users, and give you an idea how configurable and flexible Linux systems can be.

Arch Vs Gentoo

We were tempted to award first place to Arch because it’s easier to install and doesn’t require users to manage USE flags before installing packages. But the real test here is the level of control the distros offer to the users in moulding the distro to their exact specifications.

Gentoo offers pervasive control. It allows you to fine-tune the kernel during installation, so that you can remove the features you don’t want. It doesn’t get more configurable than this! What’s more, the USE flags which let you prepare the system for all the packages you wish to install or not on the system are a really novel feature.

The USE flags provide the means to specify the options and features with which Portage installs packages. This helps you cut down dependencies, package size, compile team and results in a faster and leaner system. This is why Gentoo is so much faster in comparison with the other distros.


1st: Gentoo: 5/5

2nd: Arch: 5/5

3rd: Slackware: 4/5

4th: Debian: 4/5

5th: Fedora: 3/5

Also consider…

KDE has long been a favourite with power users because of all the configuration options it offers. By extension, all KDE distros can then be described as distros for power users. So you can try OpenSUSE or Chakra Linux to get a taste of KDE’s flexibility.

We’ve tried to limit our selection to distros that not only allow you greater control in configuring the system, but are also fun to use. The distros in our list are different from all other modern Linux distros in almost all aspects, be it installation or package management. Also, they are great for familiarising yourself with the internal workings of Linux, and teach you things that you wouldn’t be aware of if you use other distros.

For this reason, it’s difficult to recommend any other distro. If you’ve already mastered Gentoo and Arch, or are ready for even more of a challenge, you can try Linux From Scratch. LFS is a book that guides you to build your system from scratch. Unlike Gentoo and Arch, which at least provide a working base system, with LFS you have to do all the work by yourself.

Source : http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/best-linux-distros-for-power-users-1153562#articleContent


Satu pemikiran pada “5 Distro Linux Power User 2013

  1. wut. Why would ‘power users’ want a distro full of preinstalled stuff that they might not want or use? In noob friendly distros, they’re full of stuff off the bat, to relieve the user from having to install and configure stuff themself, and because such a user might be less concerned with clutter, bloat and wasted resources. Surely a ‘power user’ would prefer a bare bones distro and to install their preferred packages later. Experienced Linux users are mad over which Desktop Environment they use, in particular.

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout /  Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout /  Ubah )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.